Qualcomm or MediaTek: Which One Fits Best to Your Smartphone Needs?

Qualcomm or MediaTek: Which One Fits Best to Your Smartphone Needs?

As we live in the modern age where technology is omnipresent, the innovation and improvement of electronics will remain on the rise and will recognize no limits. One of the most successful examples of these technological breakthroughs is essentially our mobile devices.

Today, a smartphone processor is a lot more powerful than what we believe. When we talk about the performance of smartphones, everyone is aware that it relies on the optimizations and hardware by the notable brands as well as developers.

Qualcomm or MediaTek

When we talk about processors, there are two labels which have governed the market, and these are Qualcomm and MediaTek.

In the time where Qualcomm is famous in the United States and European countries, MediaTek has gradually taken relatively bigger market shares, particularly in South Asia. In any manner, what exactly are the factors which make the processors between these two big producers distinct and unique in their function?

Where Everything Started

Up front, Qualcomm, established in the United States has been in the business for a long time compared to Mediatek. The American enterprise established itself in the year 1985 where it initially designed a satellite finding including messaging assistance which is known as OmniTRACS.

The Snapdragon processor was rising in reputation in 2005 when smartphones were yet to obtain any notable influence among consumers.

On the other hand, MediaTek which is a Taiwanese enterprise started in 1997 where it originally began to create chipsets for Gadgets, DVD Players, digital TVs, and many more. Essentially, Qualcomm has a considerable edge than MediaTek.


A notable difference which plays a crucial role if you are a graphic-intensive user is the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit). MediaTek and Qualcomm both apply a different set of GPUs along with an array of advantages and concerns.

MediaTek processors usually combine with Mali GPU which is created by the ARM (Advanced RISC Machine) while Qualcomm sets with the Adreno. This feature is where things get interesting as Mali GPUs are not that inferior compared to the Adreno.

Expensive vs. Inexpensive

One issue when it comes to Qualcomm processors is that the organization carry a heavy asking price for OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) to incorporate into their smartphones.

This concern is where MediaTek managed and produced its relatively affordable range of processors. Chinese smartphone manufacturers quickly perceived the potential and started producing smartphones applying MediaTek processors as a source.

However, even though their processor is quite pricey, Qualcomm is still the boss when it comes to flagship smartphones.

More Cores vs. Ideal Performance.

Another race which has been soaring quickly between these corporations is Performance vs. Power. While most of the MediaTek’s chipset feature more on power, the Qualcomm focuses more on the performance like the products in Deal Wiki.

This basis is why smartphones and particularly low-priced smartphones running with MediaTek processors would merely outshine the ones running its Qualcomm counterpart.

However, the power in MediaTek processors produced the undesired compromise on battery survival along with its overheating problems.


In deciding which variant you must choose, you need to assess your inclinations first. If you need to opt for a cheaper device and want no compromise on power, MediaTek chipsets will surely offer you with greater assistance.

On the other hand, if you are a user who wants an overall performance along with solid developer assistance, then Qualcomm’s Snapdragon must be your option all day long.

Author’s Bio

Cynthia Crane is a blogger who loves technology. At home, she likes to write articles about gadgets to provide her readers who share the same interest with appropriate information. When available, Cynthia loves to spend quality time with her family.

Share this post

Post Comment